Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20063 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ANGEL PENALOZA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-485 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defend
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20063 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ANGEL PENALOZA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-485 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defende..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 06-20063 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MIGUEL ANGEL PENALOZA-HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-485
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel
Angel Penaloza-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Penaloza-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.