Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Penaloza-Hernandez, 06-20063 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20063 Visitors: 65
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20063 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ANGEL PENALOZA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-485 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defend
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 14, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                              No. 06-20063                          Clerk
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL ANGEL PENALOZA-HERNANDEZ,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 4:05-CR-485
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel

Angel Penaloza-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Penaloza-Hernandez has not filed a response.      Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.     Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.        See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer