Filed: May 01, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 1, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20168 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY MICHAEL NIXON, also known as Mike Nixon, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-563-ALL - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larry Michael Ni
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 1, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20168 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY MICHAEL NIXON, also known as Mike Nixon, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-563-ALL - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larry Michael Nix..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 1, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-20168
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY MICHAEL NIXON, also known as Mike Nixon,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-563-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larry Michael Nixon appeals the district court’s order of
restitution following his guilty plea conviction for two counts
of bank fraud. This court reviews the propriety of a particular
restitution award for an abuse of discretion. United States v.
Hughey,
147 F.3d 423, 436 (5th Cir. 1998). A review of the
record shows that the district court’s $9,000,000 restitution
order was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.