Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Nixon, 06-20168 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20168 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 01, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 1, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20168 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY MICHAEL NIXON, also known as Mike Nixon, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-563-ALL - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larry Michael Ni
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   May 1, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 06-20168
                           Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY MICHAEL NIXON, also known as Mike Nixon,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 4:04-CR-563-ALL
                       --------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Larry Michael Nixon appeals the district court’s order of

restitution following his guilty plea conviction for two counts

of bank fraud.    This court reviews the propriety of a particular

restitution award for an abuse of discretion.     United States v.

Hughey, 
147 F.3d 423
, 436 (5th Cir. 1998).    A review of the

record shows that the district court’s $9,000,000 restitution

order was not an abuse of discretion.    Accordingly, the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer