Filed: Dec. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 12, 2007 No. 06-30406 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MOISES CARRALERO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-30058-1 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Moises Carralero
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 12, 2007 No. 06-30406 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MOISES CARRALERO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-30058-1 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Moises Carralero ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 12, 2007
No. 06-30406 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Summary Calendar Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MOISES CARRALERO
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:04-CR-30058-1
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Moises Carralero has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Carralero has filed a response and a motion for appointment
of new counsel. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
Carralero’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-30406
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
2