Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brackens v. Brackens, 06-30861 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-30861 Visitors: 43
Filed: Apr. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 9, 2007 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30861 Summary Calendar _ STACEY W. BRACKENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GLORIA BRACKENS LEONARD; GEORGIA MAE BRACKENS MCGOLTHEN; TOMMY RAY BRACKENS; DAVID LEBARON Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 5:05-CV-1377 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and OWEN, Circui
More
                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                                                   F I L E D
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                       April 9, 2007

                        _______________________                Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                              No. 06-30861
                            Summary Calendar
                        _______________________

                           STACEY W. BRACKENS,

                                                     Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                  versus

                        GLORIA BRACKENS LEONARD;
                    GEORGIA MAE BRACKENS MCGOLTHEN;
                           TOMMY RAY BRACKENS;
                              DAVID LEBARON

                                                    Defendants-Appellees.



            Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Louisiana
                           No. 5:05-CV-1377


Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

           In this case, brought in federal court based on diversity

of citizenship, the district court correctly held that Plaintiff

Stacey Brackens did not allege an amount in controversy exceeding

$75,000, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).         The district court’s

order dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

is therefore AFFIRMED.




     *
            Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer