Filed: Sep. 24, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 06-30985 F I L E D Summary Calendar September 24, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. SERGIO ARIEL CHAVEZ-BAEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-20058 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed t
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 06-30985 F I L E D Summary Calendar September 24, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. SERGIO ARIEL CHAVEZ-BAEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-20058 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 06-30985 F I L E D
Summary Calendar September 24, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SERGIO ARIEL CHAVEZ-BAEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:06-CR-20058
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Ariel Chavez-
Baez (Chavez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chavez has filed a
response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and Chavez's
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.