Filed: Apr. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40200 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO ADRIAN GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-677-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ricardo Adrian
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40200 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO ADRIAN GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-677-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ricardo Adrian ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 4, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40200
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICARDO ADRIAN GUERRERO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-677-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ricardo Adrian Guerrero has filed an unopposed motion to
summarily affirm the conviction and summarily vacate the sentence
and remand for resentencing in light of Lopez v. Gonzales,
127
S. Ct. 625 (2005), and United States v. Estrada-Mendoza,
475 F.3d
258 (5th Cir. 2007). The motion is GRANTED, the conviction is
AFFIRMED, the sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.