Filed: Aug. 17, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the August 17, 2007 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _ m 06-40342 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS ROLANDO GARCIA-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas m 4:05-CR-153-ALL _ Before JONES, Chief Judge, REAVLEY Rolando Garcia-Ortiz appeals the sixteen- and SMITH, Circuit Judges. level sentence enhancem
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the August 17, 2007 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _ m 06-40342 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS ROLANDO GARCIA-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas m 4:05-CR-153-ALL _ Before JONES, Chief Judge, REAVLEY Rolando Garcia-Ortiz appeals the sixteen- and SMITH, Circuit Judges. level sentence enhanceme..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
In the August 17, 2007
United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III
for the Fifth Circuit Clerk
_______________
m 06-40342
_______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
ROLANDO GARCIA-ORTIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
m 4:05-CR-153-ALL
______________________________
Before JONES, Chief Judge, REAVLEY Rolando Garcia-Ortiz appeals the sixteen-
and SMITH, Circuit Judges. level sentence enhancement he received based
on a Texas conviction of attempted aggravated
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:* sexual assault. We vacate and remand for de-
velopment of the record.
I.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de- Garcia-Ortiz pleaded guilty of being unlaw-
termined that this opinion should not be published fully present in the United States after being
and is not precedent except under the limited cir- deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The
cumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. presentence report (“PSR”) recommended a
base offense level of 8 pursuant to U.S.S.G. conduct. United States v. Velasco, 465 F.3d
§ 2L1.2 and a 16-level increase under § 2L1.2- 633, 638 (5th Cir. 2006). “If a statute con-
(b)(1)(A)(ii) because Garcia-Ortiz had a Tex- tains multiple, disjunctive subsections, courts
as conviction of attempted aggravated sexual maylook beyond the statute to certain ‘conclu-
assault, a “crime of violence.” Garcia-Ortiz sive records made or used in adjudicating
objected to the PSR, contesting its description guilt’ in order to determine which particular
of his earlier conviction and claiming that his statutory alternative applies to the defendant’s
confession to that crime was induced by police conviction.” United States v. Bonilla-Mungia,
coercion. The court adopted the PSR (with 422 F.3d 316, 320 (5th Cir.) (quoting United
certain exceptions not relevant to this appeal) States v. Garza-Lopez,
410 F.3d 268, 274 (5th
and sentenced Garcia-Ortiz to 71 months’ in- Cir. 2005)), cert. denied,
546 U.S. 1070
carceration. (2005). These records are generally limited to
the “charging document, written plea agree-
II. ment, transcript of the plea colloquy, and any
Because Garcia-Ortiz did not object in the explicit factual finding by the trial judge to
district court, our review is for plain error. which the defendant assented.” Id. (quoting
United States v. Gracia-Cantu,
302 F.3d 308, Shepard v. United States,
544 U.S. 13, 16
310 (5th Cir. 2002). The sentencing guide- (2005)).
lines provide for a sixteen-level enhancement
if “the defendant previously was deported, or Our first task is to determine of what par-
unlawfully remained in the United States after ticular offense Garcia-Ortiz was convicted.
a conviction for a felony that is . . . a crime of The PSR indicates that he was convicted, by
violence.” U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). A guilty plea, of attempted aggravated sexual as-
conviction can qualify as a “crime of violence” sault in 1997. Although the PSR notes that
in either of two ways: (1) if the conviction is the conviction was verified by a copy of the
for one of the enumerated offenses listed in the judgment, the appellate record does not in-
commentary to § 2L1.2, United States v. clude the judgment, and the PSR does not spe-
Garcia-Mendez,
420 F.3d 454, 456 (5th Cir. cify the statute of conviction. The parties
2005); or (2) if the crime of conviction “has as agree, however, that Garcia-Ortiz was con-
an element the use, attempted use, or threat- victed of attempted aggravated sexual assault.
ened use of physical force against the person
of another,”
id. (quoting U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, Section 15.01 of the Texas Penal Code de-
comment n.1(B)(iii)). fines the preparatory offense of criminal at-
tempt, and section 22.021 defines aggravated
We apply the categorical approach of Tay- sexual assault. Section 22.021 essentially re-
lor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602 cites the statutory definition of sexual assault,
(1990),1 under which courts determine the ele- TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.011,2 and adds three
ments of the crime by looking to the statute of
conviction, not the defendant’s underlying 2
A violation of Texas Penal Code § 22.011-
(a)(1) is not a crime of violence for purposes of
§ 2L1.2. United States v. Luciano-Rodriguez, 442
1
See, e.g. United States v. Hernandez-Rodri- F.3d 320, 323 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct.
guez, 467 F.3d 492, 494 (5th Cir. 2006) (citations 747 (2006). A violation of § 22.011(a)(2) does
omitted). (continued...)
2
discrete methods of elevating the sexual as- not tell us which subsections of section 22.021
sault to aggravated sexual assault (1) using Garcia-Ortiz’s conviction for attempted aggra-
one of six enumerated methods of coercion,3 vated sexual assault was based upon.
(2) if the victim is under fourteen years of age
or (3) if the victim is sixty-five years of age or Although the PSR contains an alleged de-
older, id. § 22.021(a)(2).4 The record does scription of the events giving rise to Garcia-
Ortiz’s earlier conviction, we cannot look to
that description to determine whether the con-
(...continued) viction was of a crime of violence. 5 The rec-
qualify, however. United States v. Alvarado-Her- ord does not contain any of the documents,
nandez, 465 F.3d 188, 190 (5th Cir. 2006). listed earlier, that we are permitted to consult.
3
Thus, on the record before us we are unable to
This prong is satisfied if the defendant identify with legal certainty which subsections
of the aggravated sexual assault statute Gar-
(i) causes serious bodily injury or attempts to
cia-Ortiz was convicted of, and thus whether
cause the death of the victim or another person
the conviction required proof of the use, at-
in the course of the same criminal episode;
tempted use, or threatened use of physical
(ii) by acts or words places the victim in fear force.
that death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping
will be imminently inflicted on any person; Where we cannot ascertain, under plain er-
ror review and for purposes of the § 2L1.2 en-
(iii) by acts or words occurring in the presence hancement, which subsection of a statute a de-
of the victim threatens to cause the death, seri- fendant violated, we vacate and remand for
ous bodily injury, or kidnapping of any person; supplementation of the record.6 Accordingly,
(iv) uses or exhibits a deadly weapon in the
course of the same criminal episode; 4
(...continued)
person “with specific intent to commit an offense
(v) acts in concert with another who engages in . . . does an act amounting to more than mere pre-
conduct described by Subdivision (1) directed paration that tends but fails to effect the commis-
toward the same victim and occurring during sion of the offense intended.” Id. § 15.01(a).
the course of the same criminal episode; or
5
Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d at 274 (“[U]nder
(vi) administers or provides flunitrazepam, oth- Shepard, a district court is not permitted to rely on
erwise known as rohypnol, gamma hydroxybu- a PSR’s characterization of a defendant’s prior of-
tyrate, or ketamine to the victim of the offense fense for enhancement purposes.”); see also United
with the intent of facilitating the commission of States v. Ochoa-Cruz,
442 F.3d 865, 867 (5th Cir.
the offense. 2006).
6
TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.021(a)(2)(A). See United States v. Gonzalez-Chavez, 432
F.3d 334, 338 (5th Cir. 2005) (“Where we cannot
4
“Attempt to commit an aggravated offense” is identify with legal certainty under which portion of
defined as when “an element that aggravates the a statute a defendant was convicted, we cannot de-
offense accompanies the attempt.” TEX. PENAL termine whether a crime of violence enhancement
CODE § 15.01(b). “Attempt” is defined as when a was proper. In such a case, we remand to the dis-
(continued...) (continued...)
3
the judgment of sentence is VACATED and
REMANDED for development of the record
and resentencing.
6
(...continued)
trict court for supplementation of the record and
re-sentencing.”) (citing Bonilla-Mungia, 422 F.3d
at 321).
4
