Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lara-Barajas, 06-40392 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-40392 Visitors: 39
Filed: Feb. 07, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40392 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADELA LARA-BARAJAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-276-ALL - Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Crimina
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 February 7, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 06-40392
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADELA LARA-BARAJAS,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7:05-CR-276-ALL
                       --------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adela Lara-

Barajas raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000), did not render

21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face.   The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer