Filed: Oct. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 06-40617 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk BRIAN C REESE Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; THREE RIVERS TEXAS FACILITY; WARDEN JOE DRIVER Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CV-452 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Brian C. Ree
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 06-40617 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk BRIAN C REESE Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; THREE RIVERS TEXAS FACILITY; WARDEN JOE DRIVER Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CV-452 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Brian C. Rees..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 3, 2007
No. 06-40617
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
BRIAN C REESE
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; THREE RIVERS TEXAS
FACILITY; WARDEN JOE DRIVER
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:05-CV-452
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Brian C. Reese, federal prisoner # 69187-080, appeals the district court’s
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application. He argues that the Bureau of Prisons
(“BOP”) has improperly determined that his federal sentences for conspiracy to
manufacture 100 grams or more of methamphetamine and possession of a
firearm by a convicted felon run consecutively to his state sentence. The district
court did not err by concluding that his federal sentences were to operate
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-40617
consecutively to his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a); Leal v. Tombone,
341 F.3d 427, 427-30 (5th Cir. 2003); Free v. Miles,
333 F.3d 550, 553 (5th Cir.
2003); United States v. Brown,
920 F.2d 1212, 1217 (5th Cir. 1991).
Reese also argues that he is entitled to credit against his federal sentences
for his time served in state custody after the imposition of his federal sentences.
Reese is not entitled to credit on his federal sentence because the time at issue
was credited toward his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); Causey v.
Civiletti,
621 F.2d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1980). The judgment of the district court
is therefore AFFIRMED.
2