Filed: Jun. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41221 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GERARDO SOSA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-499-1 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41221 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GERARDO SOSA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-499-1 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-41221
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GERARDO SOSA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-499-1
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Sosa has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sosa has filed a
response and a motion to proceed pro se. Our independent review
of the record, counsel’s brief, and Sosa’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-41221
-2-
CIR. R. 42.2. The motion to proceed pro se is DENIED. See
United States v. Wagner,
158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).