Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rosas-Pulido, 06-41268 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-41268 Visitors: 298
Filed: Jun. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-41268 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR ADAHIR ROSAS-PULIDO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-585-1 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Def
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 20, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                            No. 06-41268                          Clerk
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR ADAHIR ROSAS-PULIDO,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 7:06-CR-585-1
                       --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar

Adahir Rosas-Pulido (Rosas) has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Rosas has not filed a response.     Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.      See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer