Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hernandez, 06-50395 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-50395 Visitors: 46
Filed: Apr. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-50395 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALONDRA TERCERO HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-142-2 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represe
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 18, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 06-50395
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALONDRA TERCERO HERNANDEZ,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. 4:05-CR-142-2
                        --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Alondra Tercero Hernandez on

appeal has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Tercero

Hernandez has filed a response.   Our independent review of

counsel’s brief, the record, and Hernandez’s response discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.       See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer