Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rodriguez, 06-50438 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-50438 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 12, 2007 No. 06-50438 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. AVALINO RODRIGUEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-67-8 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Avalino Rodriguez h
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                      FILED
                                                                   December 12, 2007

                                  No. 06-50438                   Charles R. Fulbruge III
                               Conference Calendar                       Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AVALINO RODRIGUEZ

                                              Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:05-CR-67-8


Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
      The attorney appointed to represent Avalino Rodriguez has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Rodriguez has filed a response. The record is insufficiently
developed to allow consideration at this time of Rodriguez’s claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 
470 F.3d 1087
, 1091 (5th
Cir. 2006).    Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

      *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 06-50438

Rodriguez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
      Rodriguez’s request for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer