Filed: Aug. 22, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D No. 06-50578 August 22, 2007 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. PHILIP BRAZIL STONE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Philip Brazil St
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D No. 06-50578 August 22, 2007 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. PHILIP BRAZIL STONE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Philip Brazil Sto..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
No. 06-50578
August 22, 2007
Summary Calendar
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
PHILIP BRAZIL STONE
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Philip Brazil Stone has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Stone has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.