Filed: Jun. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51047 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL BERNAL-RUIZ, also known as Angel Valenzuela, also known as Angel Ruiz Bernal, also known as Angel R. Bernal, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-22-ALL - Before SMITH,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51047 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL BERNAL-RUIZ, also known as Angel Valenzuela, also known as Angel Ruiz Bernal, also known as Angel R. Bernal, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-22-ALL - Before SMITH, ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-51047
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGEL BERNAL-RUIZ, also known as Angel Valenzuela, also
known as Angel Ruiz Bernal, also known as Angel R. Bernal,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-22-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Angel Bernal-Ruiz
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal
offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.