Filed: May 29, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51452 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LOY KYLE EPTING, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-1 - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Loy Kyle Ep
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51452 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LOY KYLE EPTING, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-1 - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Loy Kyle Ept..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 29, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-51452
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LOY KYLE EPTING,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-1
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Loy Kyle Epting has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Epting has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the counsel’s brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.