Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Epting, 06-51452 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-51452 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 29, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51452 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LOY KYLE EPTING, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-1 - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Loy Kyle Ep
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   May 29, 2007

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                           No. 06-51452
                         Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LOY KYLE EPTING,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-1
                       --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Loy Kyle Epting has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Epting has not

filed a response.   Our independent review of the counsel’s brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer