Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Cleveland, 06-51581 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-51581 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51581 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURTIS WAYNE CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-193-ALL - Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Cas
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                     July 11, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 06-51581
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CURTIS WAYNE CLEVELAND,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 5:05-CR-193-ALL
                       --------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Curtis Wayne

Cleveland presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by

United States v. Daugherty, 
264 F.3d 513
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001),

which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-

possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).     The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer