Filed: Jul. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51581 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURTIS WAYNE CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-193-ALL - Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Cas
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51581 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURTIS WAYNE CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-193-ALL - Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-51581
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CURTIS WAYNE CLEVELAND,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-193-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Curtis Wayne
Cleveland presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by
United States v. Daugherty,
264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001),
which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-
possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.