Filed: Nov. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 20, 2007 No. 07-10444 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MICHAEL WAYNE HARKNESS Petitioner-Appellant v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CV-215 Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circ
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 20, 2007 No. 07-10444 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MICHAEL WAYNE HARKNESS Petitioner-Appellant v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CV-215 Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circu..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 20, 2007
No. 07-10444
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
MICHAEL WAYNE HARKNESS
Petitioner-Appellant
v.
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CV-215
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Wayne Harkness, former Texas prisoner # 1235550, pleaded
guilty to felony driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to four years of
imprisonment. Harkness now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to
appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the
denial of mandatory supervision.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-10444
During the pendency of this appeal, Harkness was released from prison
to mandatory supervision. As a result, Harkness’s due process claim challenging
the denial of § 2254 petition has been rendered moot. See Spencer v. Kemna,
523
U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland,
821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1987).
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED; COA MOTION DENIED.
2