Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gamez, 07-10445 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-10445 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 08, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 8, 2007 No. 07-10445 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO JOEL GAMEZ, also known as Mario Gomez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-166-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                November 8, 2007
                                No. 07-10445
                             Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO JOEL GAMEZ, also known as Mario Gomez

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                         USDC No. 4:06-CR-166-ALL


Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Joel Gamez presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 
920 F.2d 1212
, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), which held that a district court may order a term
of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.



      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer