Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Raspanti v. Keaty, 07-30158 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-30158 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 9, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _ No. 07-30158 Summary Calendar _ IN THE MATTER OF: THOMAS S. KEATY II Debtor - ROY A. RASPANTI, Appellant v. THOMAS S. KEATY II, Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (6:05-CV-2135) Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant Roy A. Raspanti appeals the
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 9, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _____________________ No. 07-30158 Summary Calendar _____________________ IN THE MATTER OF: THOMAS S. KEATY II Debtor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ROY A. RASPANTI, Appellant v. THOMAS S. KEATY II, Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (6:05-CV-2135) Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant Roy A. Raspanti appeals the rulings of the district court, affirming the rulings of the bankruptcy court. At the heart of the rulings of the bankruptcy court from which Raspanti appeals is the determination that * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the filing of the Chapter 13 Plan by Debtor/Appellee Thomas S. Keaty II was not in bad faith. We review the rulings of the bankruptcy court under the same standards as did the district court. We have considered all rulings and orders appealed from, as well as the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law. As a result, we are satisfied that neither the bankruptcy court nor the district court, sitting in appeal, erred reversibly. Accordingly, all rulings appealed from are affirmed, essentially for the reasons given by those courts. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer