Filed: Aug. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 8, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-40331 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARLON EFRAIN CASTRO-ALVARENGA, also known as Marlon Efrain Castro, also known as Marlon Castro Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1025-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circu
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 8, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-40331 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARLON EFRAIN CASTRO-ALVARENGA, also known as Marlon Efrain Castro, also known as Marlon Castro Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1025-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circui..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
August 8, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 07-40331
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARLON EFRAIN CASTRO-ALVARENGA, also known as Marlon Efrain
Castro, also known as Marlon Castro
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-1025-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marlon Efrain Castro-
Alvarenga raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a
penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion
for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.