Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Espinoza-Moreno, 07-40354 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40354 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 07-40354 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DOMINGO ESPINOZA-MORENO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1408-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Domingo
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                 FILED
                                                                October 3, 2007
                               No. 07-40354
                            Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DOMINGO ESPINOZA-MORENO

                                          Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 5:06-CR-1408-ALL


Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Domingo Espinoza-Moreno
raises arguments challenging the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. ยงยง 841 and 851
that he concedes are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998). United States v. Mata, 
491 F.3d 237
, 245 (5th Cir. 2007). The
Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.



      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer