Filed: Oct. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 07-40460 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERTO HINOJOSA-CASTILLO, also known as Roberto Manuel Hinojosa-Castillo, also known as Prieto Himojosa Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1125-1 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, C
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 07-40460 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERTO HINOJOSA-CASTILLO, also known as Roberto Manuel Hinojosa-Castillo, also known as Prieto Himojosa Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1125-1 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Ci..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 3, 2007
No. 07-40460
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ROBERTO HINOJOSA-CASTILLO, also known as Roberto Manuel
Hinojosa-Castillo, also known as Prieto Himojosa
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-1125-1
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Hinojosa-Castillo
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523
U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision
and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d
624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-20230
appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
2