Filed: Sep. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 07-40478 F I L E D Summary Calendar September 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. BOBBY PEREZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-459-1 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bobby Perez, federal inmate # 82235-079, pleaded guilty to a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 07-40478 F I L E D Summary Calendar September 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. BOBBY PEREZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-459-1 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bobby Perez, federal inmate # 82235-079, pleaded guilty to a ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 07-40478 F I L E D
Summary Calendar September 6, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BOBBY PEREZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-459-1
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bobby Perez, federal inmate # 82235-079, pleaded guilty to a marijuana-
trafficking conspiracy charge and was sentenced to 87 months of imprisonment.
He filed a notice of appeal more than one year after the criminal judgment was
entered. His appeal is dismissed as untimely. See United States v. Leijano-
Cruz,
473 F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 2006). Perez also filed two motions for
appointment of counsel. These motions are denied.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.