Filed: Dec. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-40685 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE SANTOS RODRIGUEZ-ESPINOZA, also known as Santos Joe Rodriguez-Espinoza Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-216-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-40685 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE SANTOS RODRIGUEZ-ESPINOZA, also known as Santos Joe Rodriguez-Espinoza Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-216-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 5, 2007
No. 07-40685
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE SANTOS RODRIGUEZ-ESPINOZA, also known as Santos Joe
Rodriguez-Espinoza
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:07-CR-216-1
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Santos Rodriguez-
Espinoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a
penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v.
Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-40685
28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2