Filed: Nov. 13, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 13, 2007 No. 07-50042 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL PAUL LOPEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1070-2 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Daniel Paul Lopez appeals his guilty-p
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 13, 2007 No. 07-50042 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL PAUL LOPEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1070-2 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Daniel Paul Lopez appeals his guilty-pl..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 13, 2007
No. 07-50042
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
DANIEL PAUL LOPEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:06-CR-1070-2
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit
Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Daniel Paul Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for
conspiracy to import five hundred or more grams of cocaine into the United
States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. ยงยง 963, 952(a), 960(a)(1), and 960(b)(2).
Lopez argues that the Government breached the plea agreement in his
case by advocating that he be held accountable for a drug quantity higher than
that stipulated to in the factual resume which formed the basis for the guilty
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-50042
plea. Lopez has neither shown that his interpretation of the plea agreement was
reasonable nor met his burden of establishing a breach of the plea agreement;
thus he has not shown plain error with respect to this claim. See United States
v. Reeves,
255 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 2001).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2