Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Chavez-Maciel, 07-50214 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-50214 Visitors: 42
Filed: Sep. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 6, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-50214 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MANUEL GERARDO CHAVEZ-MACIEL Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-816-ALL Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case,
More
                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                                                     F I L E D
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                            September 6, 2007
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                         Clerk
                               No. 07-50214
                            Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL GERARDO CHAVEZ-MACIEL

                                         Defendant-Appellant


                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. 2:06-CR-816-ALL


Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Manuel Gerardo Chavez-
Maciel raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a
penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v.
Pineda-Arrellano, 
492 F.3d 624
, 625 (5th Cir. 2007). The Government's motion




     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                               No. 07-50214

for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer