Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 07-50391 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO ANTONIO ORTIZ-GOMEZ, also known as Antonio Gomez, also known as Antonio Ortiz Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-178-2 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PE
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 07-50391 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO ANTONIO ORTIZ-GOMEZ, also known as Antonio Gomez, also known as Antonio Ortiz Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-178-2 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2007
No. 07-50391
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARCO ANTONIO ORTIZ-GOMEZ, also known as Antonio Gomez, also known
as Antonio Ortiz
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:06-CR-178-2
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Marco Antonio Ortiz-Gomez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ortiz-Gomez has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-50391
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2