Filed: Dec. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS I L E D F FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-50897 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CARLOS ANGEL GUZMAN-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-338-ALL Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS I L E D F FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-50897 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CARLOS ANGEL GUZMAN-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-338-ALL Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS I L E D
F
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 07-50897
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CARLOS ANGEL GUZMAN-MARTINEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:07-CR-338-ALL
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Angel Guzman-
Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a
penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.
Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.
28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.