Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jurado, 06-51544 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-51544 Visitors: 59
Filed: Apr. 16, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 16, 2008 No. 06-51544 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LINCOLN ENRIQUE JURADO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2569-4 Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Lincoln Enrique Ju
More
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                               FILED
                                                               April 16, 2008
                               No. 06-51544
                            Conference Calendar           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LINCOLN ENRIQUE JURADO

                                         Defendant-Appellant


                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Western District of Texas
                         USDC No. 3:05-CR-2569-4


Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
     The attorney appointed to represent Lincoln Enrique Jurado has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Jurado has not filed a response, but he has
requested the appointment of new counsel. Jurado’s request for the appointment
of new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 
158 F.3d 901
, 902-03
(5th Cir. 1998). Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief



     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 06-51544

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer