Filed: Feb. 20, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 06-51634 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ENRIQUE OLIVARES-ARREGUIN, also known as Marco Antonio Alcanta-Ayala Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2066-ALL Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The at
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 06-51634 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ENRIQUE OLIVARES-ARREGUIN, also known as Marco Antonio Alcanta-Ayala Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2066-ALL Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The att..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 20, 2008
No. 06-51634
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ENRIQUE OLIVARES-ARREGUIN, also known as Marco Antonio
Alcanta-Ayala
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:06-CR-2066-ALL
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Enrique Olivares-Arreguin has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Olivares-Arreguin has filed a response. The
record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Olivares-
Arreguin’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v.
Cantwell,
470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-51634
record, counsel’s brief, and Olivares-Arreguin’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Olivares-Arreguin’s
motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
2