Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. McEver, 07-10773 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-10773 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jan. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 30, 2008 No. 07-10773 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHN MCEVER Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-13-ALL Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, John McEver pres
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                 FILED
                                                               January 30, 2008
                               No. 07-10773
                            Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHN MCEVER

                                          Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 4:07-CR-13-ALL



Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, John McEver presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 
920 F.2d 1212
, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v.
Candia, 
454 F.3d 468
, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a district court
may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state



      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                               No. 07-10773

sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and
the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer