Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Sengsatheuane, 07-20856 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-20856 Visitors: 54
Filed: Apr. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2008 No. 07-20856 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. EKNALI NICK SENGSATHEUANE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-216-ALL Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eknali
More
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                               FILED
                                                               April 30, 2008
                               No. 07-20856
                            Conference Calendar           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EKNALI NICK SENGSATHEUANE

                                         Defendant-Appellant


                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 4:07-CR-216-ALL


Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eknali Nick Sengsatheuane
presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States
v. Daugherty, 
264 F.3d 513
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce
Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.



     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer