Filed: Oct. 23, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-30604 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-30604 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of c..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 22, 2008
No. 07-30604
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess
cocaine base, methylenedioxy amphetamine (ecstasy), and marijuana with intent
to distribute (Count One), and one count of possession of cocaine base with intent
to distribute (Count Five). He appeals the mandatory life sentence imposed as
to Count One on the basis that it violated his Sixth Amendment right to have a
jury determine the facts of his prior drug convictions. As Fontenot concedes, his
argument is foreclosed. See Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000);
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-30604
United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007), cert.
denied,
128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2