Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Fontenot, 07-30604 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-30604 Visitors: 35
Filed: Oct. 23, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-30604 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 22, 2008
                                     No. 07-30604
                                  Conference Calendar                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                              Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7


Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess
cocaine base, methylenedioxy amphetamine (ecstasy), and marijuana with intent
to distribute (Count One), and one count of possession of cocaine base with intent
to distribute (Count Five). He appeals the mandatory life sentence imposed as
to Count One on the basis that it violated his Sixth Amendment right to have a
jury determine the facts of his prior drug convictions. As Fontenot concedes, his
argument is foreclosed. See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
, 490 (2000);


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                                 No. 07-30604

United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 
492 F.3d 624
, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007), cert.
denied, 
128 S. Ct. 872
(2008).
      The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer