Filed: Mar. 04, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 4, 2008 No. 07-40395 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk PHILLIPS STAFFING SERVICES INC, doing business as All Star Staffing Services Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee v. TEMPAY INC Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman No. 4:05-CV-407 Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We agree with the district
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 4, 2008 No. 07-40395 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk PHILLIPS STAFFING SERVICES INC, doing business as All Star Staffing Services Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee v. TEMPAY INC Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman No. 4:05-CV-407 Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We agree with the district c..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 4, 2008 No. 07-40395 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk PHILLIPS STAFFING SERVICES INC, doing business as All Star Staffing Services Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee v. TEMPAY INC Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman No. 4:05-CV-407 Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We agree with the district court that defendant - appellant Tempay, Inc. waived its right to arbitration set out in the Funding Agreement between Tempay and plaintiff - appellee Phillips Staffing Services Inc., d/b/a All Star Staffing Services, Inc. Accordingly, the order of the district court entered March * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-40395 23, 2007 denying Tempay’s motion to dismiss and stay is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court in that order. AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 2
