Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Oliver v. Morris, 07-40408 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40408 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 20, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-40408 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk TERRANCE L OLIVER Plaintiff-Appellant v. TRAVIS MORRIS; RICHARD THOMPSON; BEVERLY PARKER; SHIRLEY SELF; WENDELL WARREN Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CV-286 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Terranc
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                      FILED
                                                                   February 20, 2008
                                  No. 07-40408
                               Conference Calendar               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                         Clerk

TERRANCE L OLIVER

                                              Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TRAVIS MORRIS; RICHARD THOMPSON; BEVERLY PARKER; SHIRLEY
SELF; WENDELL WARREN

                                              Defendants-Appellees


                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 6:06-CV-286


Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Terrance L. Oliver, Texas prisoner # 739573, appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his pro se civil rights suit as frivolous and for failure to state a claim
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Oliver complained that after he was moved
from safekeeping status to the general population, he was stabbed by another
inmate. While Oliver was at the infirmary, Lt. Wendell Warren ordered him to




      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                  No. 07-40408

return to his cell without medical care and prohibited the nurse from
documenting Oliver’s injury.
      Oliver argues that the district court erred in not allowing him an
opportunity to amend his complaint to exhaust administrative remedies against
Lt. Warren and to state a claim against Lt. Warren for interfering with access
to medical treatment. His first assertion is frivolous as the district court did not
dismiss his claims against Lt. Warren for failure to exhaust.
      The district court accepted Oliver’s assertions regarding Lt. Warren’s
conduct; thus, no amendment regarding this conduct was necessary to the
disposition of the case. Oliver does not suggest how he could have amended his
complaint to overcome the district court’s finding that his stab wound was a
superficial pinpoint wound and, thus, not a serious medical need. Accordingly,
Oliver has not shown that the district court erred in not allowing him to amend
his complaint. See Jones v. Greninger, 
188 F.3d 322
, 326-27 (5th Cir. 1999);
Jacquez v. Procunier, 
801 F.2d 789
, 793 (5th Cir. 1986).
      Oliver does not brief any argument challenging the district court’s
conclusion that he failed to state a constitutional violation because his injury
was not a serious medical need. Accordingly, he has abandoned any challenge
to the dismissal of that claim. See Yohey v. Collins, 
985 F.2d 222
, 224-25 (5th
Cir. 1993). Oliver has not briefed and, thus, has abandoned any challenge to the
dismissal of his claims against Michael Unit Warden Thompson and Officers
Morris, Parker, and Self. See 
id. Oliver’s appeal
is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous.
See Howard v. King, 
707 F.2d 215
, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We
warn Oliver that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and the dismissal
of this appeal count as strikes under § 1915(g), and that if he accumulates three
strikes, he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or
appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is



                                         2
                                No. 07-40408

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383
, 388 (5th Cir. 1996).
      APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.




                                     3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer