Filed: Feb. 20, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-40446 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIGUEL ANGEL FARIAS-BARRON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-140-1 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-40446 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIGUEL ANGEL FARIAS-BARRON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-140-1 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 20, 2008
No. 07-40446
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MIGUEL ANGEL FARIAS-BARRON
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:07-CR-140-1
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Farias-
Barron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Farias-Barron has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.