Filed: Oct. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2008 No. 07-40973 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LONNEY CHARLES WILLIAMS Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-61-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represen
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2008 No. 07-40973 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LONNEY CHARLES WILLIAMS Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-61-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 3, 2008
No. 07-40973
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LONNEY CHARLES WILLIAMS
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:06-CR-61-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lonney Charles
Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Williams has filed a response.
Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Williams’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-40973
herein, Williams’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2