Filed: Feb. 20, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-50260 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARTIN ALEJANDRO MEZA-SANCHEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1523-ALL Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Martin Al
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-50260 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARTIN ALEJANDRO MEZA-SANCHEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1523-ALL Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Martin Ale..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 20, 2008
No. 07-50260
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARTIN ALEJANDRO MEZA-SANCHEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:06-CR-1523-ALL
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Martin Alejandro Meza-Sanchez
(Meza) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Meza has filed a response. The record
is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Meza’s claims
of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell,
470 F.3d
1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-50260
brief, and Meza’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2