Filed: Feb. 20, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-50348 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FEDERICO ENRIQUEZ-PEREGRINO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1800-2 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Federico Enri
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-50348 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FEDERICO ENRIQUEZ-PEREGRINO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1800-2 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Federico Enriq..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 20, 2008
No. 07-50348
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FEDERICO ENRIQUEZ-PEREGRINO
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:06-CR-1800-2
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Federico Enriquez-Peregrino has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Enriquez-Peregrino has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.