Filed: Jun. 25, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 25, 2008 No. 07-50858 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANDRE GIBSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-238-1 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Andre Gibson, federal prisoner # 28834-180, appeals, pro se, the dis
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 25, 2008 No. 07-50858 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANDRE GIBSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-238-1 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Andre Gibson, federal prisoner # 28834-180, appeals, pro se, the dist..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 25, 2008
No. 07-50858
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ANDRE GIBSON
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:02-CR-238-1
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Andre Gibson, federal prisoner # 28834-180, appeals, pro se, the district
court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of its order granting the
Government’s motion to reduce Gibson’s sentence from 108 to 96 months
pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). Gibson asserts the
Government breached its agreement to recommend a greater reduction.
A motion for reconsideration in a criminal proceeding is timely if filed
within the period allotted for noticing an appeal; in this instance, within ten
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
days of the order granting the Rule 35(b) motion. See United States v. Brewer,
60 F.3d 1142, 1143-44 (5th Cir. 1995); FED. R. APP. P. 4(b). Gibson’s motion,
however, was filed more than fifteen months after the order. Accordingly, it was
untimely. See United States v. Cook,
670 F.2d 46, 48-49 (5th Cir. 1982).
AFFIRMED.
2