Filed: Sep. 15, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 15, 2008 No. 07-51003 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSHUA NEHEMIAH REYNA, also known as Joshua Nemiah Reyna Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-220-ALL Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Joshua Nehemiah Reyna
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 15, 2008 No. 07-51003 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSHUA NEHEMIAH REYNA, also known as Joshua Nemiah Reyna Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-220-ALL Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Joshua Nehemiah Reyna a..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 15, 2008
No. 07-51003
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSHUA NEHEMIAH REYNA, also known as Joshua Nemiah Reyna
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:05-CR-220-ALL
Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Joshua Nehemiah Reyna appeals the mandatory consecutive 60-month
and 300-month sentences imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for
possession of a firearm during a drug-trafficking offense. Reyna argues that the
sentences are cruel and unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment because
they are grossly disproportionate to the severity of the offenses committed.
Because Reyna failed to object on this ground in the district court, review
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-51003
is for plain error. See United States v. Howard,
220 F.3d 645, 647 (5th Cir.
2000). In comparison to the life sentence imposed in Rummel v. Estelle,
445 U.S.
263 (1980), on a non-violent criminal pursuant to a recidivist statute, and the 30-
year sentence imposed in United States v. Gonzales,
121 F.3d 928, 943-44 (5th
Cir. 1997), on a non-habitual offender convicted of using or carrying a firearm
during a drug-trafficking offense, the sentences imposed on Reyna are not
grossly disproportionate to his offenses. See
Gonzales, 121 F.3d at 943;
McGruder v. Puckett,
954 F.2d 313, 316 (5th Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2