Filed: Oct. 22, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-51127 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEROY LASHAN SHELTON, also known as Big Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-89-2 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Le
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-51127 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEROY LASHAN SHELTON, also known as Big Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-89-2 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Ler..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 22, 2008
No. 07-51127
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LEROY LASHAN SHELTON, also known as Big
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:06-CR-89-2
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Leroy Lashan Shelton has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Shelton has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.