Buxton v. Lil' Drug Store Prod, 07-60657 (2008)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 07-60657
Visitors: 66
Filed: Sep. 24, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 24, 2008 No. 07-60657 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk DELOIS BUXTON, As Mother and Duly Appointed Guardian of Stacy Shanta Buxton Plaintiff - Appellant v. LIL’ DRUG STORE PRODUCTS INC; NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION; NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Before JOLLY, GARZA,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 24, 2008 No. 07-60657 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk DELOIS BUXTON, As Mother and Duly Appointed Guardian of Stacy Shanta Buxton Plaintiff - Appellant v. LIL’ DRUG STORE PRODUCTS INC; NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION; NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Before JOLLY, GARZA, ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 24, 2008 No. 07-60657 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk DELOIS BUXTON, As Mother and Duly Appointed Guardian of Stacy Shanta Buxton Plaintiff - Appellant v. LIL’ DRUG STORE PRODUCTS INC; NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION; NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Before JOLLY, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.. PER CURIAM:* We have reviewed the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, and the applicable law and have heard the arguments of counsel. It is clear that the district court in its thorough opinion committed no reversible error. Its judgment, therefore, is AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
