Filed: Oct. 28, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 28, 2008 No. 08-10575 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk MATILDE ROSALES Plaintiff - Appellee v. JOSE PENA, In his individual and official capacity; WILLIAM PHILLIPS, In his individual and official capacity Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CV-588 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Ci
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 28, 2008 No. 08-10575 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk MATILDE ROSALES Plaintiff - Appellee v. JOSE PENA, In his individual and official capacity; WILLIAM PHILLIPS, In his individual and official capacity Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CV-588 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Cir..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 28, 2008
No. 08-10575 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Summary Calendar Clerk
MATILDE ROSALES
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
JOSE PENA, In his individual and official capacity;
WILLIAM PHILLIPS, In his individual and official capacity
Defendants - Appellants
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CV-588
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
These police officers appeal from the district court’s judgment denying
their qualified immunity defense to plaintiff’s claim of assault and battery in the
course of an unlawful arrest. Appellants’ briefs present a spirited advocacy of
the record on their behalf. That will not suffice in view of the district court’s
decision that fact issues are raised by the evidence in favor of the plaintiff’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-10575
Summary Calendar
claim. This court therefore lacks jurisdiction of the appeal. See Kinney v.
Weaver,
367 F.3d 337, 348 (5th Cir. 2004).
DISMISSED.
2