Nickerson v. Groendyke Transport, 08-50776 (2008)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 08-50776
Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 02, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED _ December 2, 2008 No. 08-50776 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk PATRICK M. NICKERSON Plaintiff-Appellant v. GROENDYKE TRANSPORT, INC.; GREAT WEST CASUALTY CO. Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (3:08-CV-47) Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Patrick M. Nic
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED _ December 2, 2008 No. 08-50776 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk PATRICK M. NICKERSON Plaintiff-Appellant v. GROENDYKE TRANSPORT, INC.; GREAT WEST CASUALTY CO. Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (3:08-CV-47) Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Patrick M. Nick..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED _____________________ December 2, 2008 No. 08-50776 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk PATRICK M. NICKERSON Plaintiff-Appellant v. GROENDYKE TRANSPORT, INC.; GREAT WEST CASUALTY CO. Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (3:08-CV-47) Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Patrick M. Nickerson, proceeding pro se on appeal as he did in the district court, seeks reversal of the district court’s judgment dismissing Nickerson’s action with prejudice. Our review of the entire record on appeal, including the district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of April 15, 2008, convinces us that the patient and detailed analysis and * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. explanation contained in the district court’s opinion totally and correctly support its judgment. For essentially the same reasons thus set forth by the district court, we affirm the dismissal of Nickerson’s lawsuit with prejudice. AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
