Ladner v. Hancock Cty Sch Dist, 08-60408 (2008)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 08-60408
Visitors: 26
Filed: Sep. 11, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 11, 2008 No. 08-60408 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MICHAEL R LADNER Plaintiff - Appellant v. HANCOCK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:07-CV-901 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Ladner, a teacher and basketball coac
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 11, 2008 No. 08-60408 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MICHAEL R LADNER Plaintiff - Appellant v. HANCOCK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:07-CV-901 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Ladner, a teacher and basketball coach..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 11, 2008 No. 08-60408 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MICHAEL R LADNER Plaintiff - Appellant v. HANCOCK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:07-CV-901 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Ladner, a teacher and basketball coach, sued Hancock County School District after it decided not to renew his employment contract. Ladner claimed, among other things, that he did not receive proper notice of the School District’s decision. The School District was granted summary judgment and Ladner has appealed. Having carefully reviewed the record, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
