Trinity Meadows v. TX Racing Cmsn St TX, 08-10286 (2009)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 08-10286
Visitors: 40
Filed: Jan. 13, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 13, 2009 No. 08-10286 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk In The Matter Of: TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY INC Debtor TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY INC Appellant v. TEXAS RACING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; R DYKE ROGERS, In Capacity as former and acting chair of the Texas Racing Commission of the State of Texas Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 13, 2009 No. 08-10286 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk In The Matter Of: TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY INC Debtor TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY INC Appellant v. TEXAS RACING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; R DYKE ROGERS, In Capacity as former and acting chair of the Texas Racing Commission of the State of Texas Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District o..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 13, 2009 No. 08-10286 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk In The Matter Of: TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY INC Debtor TRINITY MEADOWS RACEWAY INC Appellant v. TEXAS RACING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; R DYKE ROGERS, In Capacity as former and acting chair of the Texas Racing Commission of the State of Texas Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CV-670 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After having reviewed the briefs and the record, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons given by the learned bankruptcy judge in his Memorandum Opinion entered on September 12, 2007. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
