Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Dolenz, 08-10433 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-10433 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 16, 2009 No. 08-10433 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. BERNARD JOSEPH DOLENZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-107-ALL Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bernard
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           March 16, 2009
                                     No. 08-10433
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BERNARD JOSEPH DOLENZ

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:98-CR-107-ALL


Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bernard Joseph
Dolenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Dolenz has filed a response. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Dolenz’s response discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer