Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Prescott, 08-10636 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-10636 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 27, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 27, 2009 No. 08-10636 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANDRE PRESCOTT Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-2-ALL Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The federal public defender appointed to represent Andre Presco
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           March 27, 2009
                                     No. 08-10636
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDRE PRESCOTT

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:08-CR-2-ALL


Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The federal public defender appointed to represent Andre Prescott has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).            Prescott has not filed a response.            Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer